ENGLISH TEACHERS’ PERCEPTIONS OF STAD IN TEACHING READING AT VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47178/z3rxrp84Keywords:
cooperative learning, EFL reading comprehension, STAD method, teacher perceptions, vocational educationAbstract
This study explores English teachers’ perceptions of implementing Student Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) in teaching reading at Vocational High Schools (VHS). The study focuses on its benefits, challenges, and strategies. This study employed a qualitative descriptive design. The participants comprised five EFL vocational teachers selected via purposive sampling. The data were gathered through semi-structured interviews and classroom observation as supporting data and analyzed using thematic analysis. The findings revealed that teachers perceived STAD as beneficial in increasing students’ enthusiasm, improving time efficiency, promoting peer tutoring, developing students’ self-awareness, and enhancing social interaction during reading activities. Teachers reported that STAD’s cooperative team structure supports students in discussion so that their understanding of vocabulary and key ideas of functional texts is improved. However, challenges included students’ limited background knowledge, time-consuming preparation, student passivity, technology dependence, classroom management challenges, students’ role distortion, and inadequate facilities. Teachers applied continuous monitoring, thorough preparation, maintaining teacher credibility, providing motivation and rewards, and extra classes to address these challenges. Overall, STAD was perceived positively because it supported cooperative learning while strengthening reading comprehension and social affective outcomes in VHS. This study contributes to the understanding of STAD implementation in teaching reading at VHS.
References
Acharya, B. (2025). Teacher’s Perceptions toward Teaching-Learning Pedagogy and Professional Development: Insights from Nepal. Acta Educationis Generalis, 15(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2025-0001
Ariesa, A., Sudarsono, S., & Suhartono, L. (2021). Teacher’s Experience in Teaching Speaking by Using STAD. Journal of English Education Program, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.26418/jeep.v2i2.48100
Ary, D., Jacobs, L., Irvine, C. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to Research in Education (10th Edition). Cengage Learning.
Awada, G., Burston, J., & Ghannage, R. (2020). Effect of student team achievement division through WebQuest on EFL students’ argumentative writing skills and their instructors’ perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(3), 275–300. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1558254
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chakyarkandiyil, N., & Prakasha, G. S. (2023). Cooperative Learning Strategies: Implementation Challenges in Teacher Education. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 81(3), 340–360. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/23.81.340
Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2014). Designing Groupwork: Strategies for The Heterogeneous Classroom Third Edition (Third). Teachers College Press.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.
Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective Practices for Developing Reading Comprehension. International Reading Association, Inc.
Gillies, R. M. (2008). Teachers’ and Students’ Verbal Behaviours During Cooperative Learning. In The Teacher’s Role in Implementing Cooperative Learning in the Classroom (pp. 238–257). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-70892-8_12
Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning: Review of research and practice. In Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Vol. 41, Number 3, pp. 39–54). Social Science Press. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3
Hamid, R., Manda, M. L., Yassi, A. H., & Jubhari, R. R. (2020). Dominant Influence of Linguistic Knowledge in EFL Reading Comprehension: Schemata Analysis. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(12), 6715–6721. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.081236
Harianingsih, I., & Jusoh, Z. (2022). A Review of Studies on Cooperative Learning in Language Classroom Seen From Students’ Attitudes. IJEAL (International Journal of English and Applied Linguistics), 2.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2019). Cooperative Learning: The Foundation for Active Learning. IntechOpen.
Kholifah, N., Nurtanto, M., Sutrisno, V. L. P., Majid, N. W. A., Subakti, H., Daryono, R. W., & Achmadi, A. (2025). Unlocking workforce readiness through digital employability skills in vocational education graduates: A PLS-SEM analysis based on human capital theory. Social Sciences and Humanities Open, 11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101625
Morsi, W. K., & Rezk, W. A. (2025). Advancing literary interpretation via critical reading proficiency: A sustainable EFL framework for generation z. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(2), 327–338. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1502.02
Nation, I. S. P. (2009). Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing. www.routledgeeducation.com
Nguyen, C., Trinh, T., Le, D., & Nguyen, T. (2021). Cooperative Learning in English Language Classrooms: Teachers’ Perceptions and Actions. Anatolian Journal of Education, 6(2), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2021.628a
Ningrum, A. S. B., Ompumona, C., Syaifulloh, B., & Addeq, M. (2024). Empowering Students Using Cooperative Learning Strategies Through STAD in Reading Class. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.30762/ijomer.v2i1.2702
Padauleng, A., Abduh, A., Samtidar, Muslim, A., Mujizatullah, Massoweang, A. K., Ridwan, M., Darmawati, B., & Rosidi, A. (2025). Differentiated Instruction in a Public Junior High School: EFL Teachers’ Perception and Practices. World Journal of English Language, 15(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v15n3p277
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Sari, A. W., Amalia, N., Emelia, T. W., & Arifin, M. (2024). Teaching Materials for Reading in a Professional Context to Improve the Reading Skills of English Education Program Students. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 8(1), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppp.v8i1.65693
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice (2nd ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Slavin, R. E. (2014). Aprendizaje cooperativo y rendimiento académico: ¿por qué funciona el trabajo grupal? Anales de Psicologia, 30(3), 785–791. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.3.201201
Slavin, R. E., Hurley, E. A., & Chamberlain, A. (2003). Cooperative Learning and Achievement: Theory and Research. In Handbook of Psychology (pp. 177–198). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0709
Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. RAND Corporation.
Sobandi, A., Yuniarsih, T., Rasto, & Adman. (2020). Learning Facilities: Can It improve the vocational school productivity? Journal of Educational and Social Research, 10(4), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2020-0074
Suhaila, J., Meila, S., Aisyah, R., Bima, E., Harahap, K., Lubis, Y., & Kunci, K. (2025). Improving Reading Comprehension Skills in Reading. Invention: Journal Research and Education Studies, 6, 477–487. https://pusdikra-publishing.com/index.php/jres
Suranto, & Zalukhu, I. M. (2025). Implementation of the STAD Cooperative Learning Model to Improve Indonesian Language Learning Outcomes in Elementary School. ETERNAL (English Teaching Journal), 16(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.26877/eternal.v16i1.1113
Wang, G. (2020). On the Application of Cooperative Learning in College English Teaching. International Education Studies, 13(6), 62. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v13n6p62
Zhang, S., Zhao, X., Zhou, T., & Kim, J. H. (2024). Do you have AI dependency? The roles of academic self-efficacy, academic stress, and performance expectations on problematic AI usage behavior. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00467-0
