USING DIGITAL HISTORICAL PRIMARY SOURCES AS AUTHENTIC EFL MATERIALS: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR CRITICAL READING AND DIGITAL LITERACY

Authors

  • Burhaman Burhaman Universitas Pejuang Republik Indonesia
  • Suhenrik P Universitas Pejuang Republik Indonesia
  • Siti Nur Asia Universitas Pejuang Republik Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47178/81mr3524

Keywords:

authentic materials, critical reading, digital historical primary sources, digital literacy, EFL reading

Abstract

Digital historical primary sources offer underexplored possibilities as authentic materials for technology-enhanced English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learning. However, the available evidence is dispersed across EFL, digital literacy, educational technology, and history education, and therefore does not yet justify claims of instructional effectiveness. This integrative review synthesized 42 publications published primarily between 2020 and 2025, together with selected foundational works. The literature was identified through Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Taylor & Francis Online, Wiley Online Library, and Google Scholar, and was screened through title-and-abstract review followed by full-text eligibility assessment. The original search log did not retain the initial retrieval, deduplication, or stage-by-stage exclusion counts, which limits reproducibility and is reported as a methodological constraint rather than reconstructed retrospectively. The synthesis suggests three interrelated propositions: digital historical primary sources may provide linguistically and culturally rich input; source evaluation, contextualization, and corroboration may support critical reading and digital literacy; and pedagogical value depends on proficiency-sensitive scaffolding, source readability, ethical representation, accessibility, and task design. Based on these propositions, the study proposes the SAKTI-P Framework: Curatorial Selection, Source Authentication, Contextualization, Triangulation of Evidence, Interpretation, and Reflective Publication. The framework is a theoretically informed conceptual design, not an empirically validated model. Its interdisciplinary evidence base, limited number of direct EFL studies, incomplete screening records, and lack of expert validation or classroom testing require cautious interpretation and further investigation.

References

Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x

Derakhshan, A., Coombe, C., Zhaleh, K., & Tabatabaeian, M. (2022). Examining the roles of teachers' professional development and authentic learning in EFL education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 889242. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.889242

Fahruddin, F., & Saefudin, A. (2025). Primary sources in online history learning: Enhancing engagement and retention. Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2452087. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2452087

Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Digital literacies in language learning: Directions for research and practice. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 5-15.

Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318

Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159, Article 104009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009

McGrew, S. (2022). Internet or archive? Expertise in searching for digital sources on a contentious historical question. Cognition and Instruction, 40(4), 488-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2021.1908288

Miguel-Revilla, D., Calle-Carracedo, M., & Sánchez-Agustí, M. (2021). Fostering engagement and historical understanding with a digital learning environment in secondary education. E-Learning and Digital Media, 18(4), 344-360. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753020957452

Moorhouse, B. L., & Kohnke, L. (2021). Responses of English language teachers to online teaching during COVID-19. RELC Journal, 52(3), 359-374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220986201

Sariyatun, S., Sutimin, L. A., & Abidin, N. F. (2025). Enhancing historical thinking and higher-order thinking skills through inquiry-based digital learning materials using primary sources. Journal of Curriculum Studies Research, 7(2), 228-248. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcsr.2025.19

Tai, K. W. H., Chen, H. H. J., & Todd, G. (2022). Critical digital literacy for language learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1451-1475. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1868651

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606

Widiadi, A. N., Sheehan, M., & Shep, S. (2022). The potential of web-based historical sources as learning resources to foster students' historical thinking skills. Paramita: Historical Studies Journal, 32(1), 138-148. https://doi.org/10.15294/paramita.v32i1.31048

Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2022). Technology-enhanced language learning for reading comprehension: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), 1760-1788. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1839503

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

USING DIGITAL HISTORICAL PRIMARY SOURCES AS AUTHENTIC EFL MATERIALS: A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR CRITICAL READING AND DIGITAL LITERACY. (2026). Teaching English As a Foreign Language Overseas Journal, 14(1), 105-119. https://doi.org/10.47178/81mr3524