THE USE OF ACTIVE LEARNING STRATEGIES TO IMPROVE THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ICT) LEARNING AMONG FIFTH GRADE STUDENTS AT UPT SD INPRES 10/73 WELADO, BONE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47178/ehe4ra75Keywords:
active learning strategies, ICT learning, learning effectiveness, elementary school studentsAbstract
This study aims to improve the effectiveness of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) learning through the use of active learning strategies among fifth grade students at UPT SD Inpres 10/73 Welado, Bone Regency. The research was conducted using Classroom Action Research (CAR) with a cyclical model consisting of planning, action, observation, and reflection. The subjects of this study were fifth grade students, while the object of the study was the effectiveness of ICT learning, which was measured through student learning outcomes, learning activities, and student engagement during the learning process. Active learning strategies implemented in this study included group discussions, hands-on practice, question-and-answer activities, and collaborative learning. The results showed a significant improvement in learning effectiveness, indicated by increased student participation, higher motivation, and improved learning outcomes from the first cycle to the second cycle. These findings suggest that the use of active learning strategies can effectively enhance ICT learning effectiveness and create a more interactive and student-centered learning environment in elementary schools.
References
Arikunto, S. (2013). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Bloom, B. S. et al. 2005. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Classification of educational goald. New York: McKey.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: George Washington University.
Darsono , Max. 2000. Belajar dan pembelajaran. Semarang : CV. IKIP Semarang Press.
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415.
Gagne, Robert. 1978. Principles of Instructional Design. 2nd Ed, New York : Holt Rinehart and Winstons.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. Victoria: Deakin University Press.
Mappa, S & Basleman, A. 1994. Teori Belajar Orang Dewasa. Jakarta: Dipnakes.
Muijs, Daniel & Reynolds, David. 2008. EffectiveTteaching Teori dan Aplikasi ( Edisi ke -2 ) Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Mulyasa, Enco. 2007. Menjadi Guru Profesional. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nasution, Andi Hakim . 1988. Landasan Matematika. Jakarta : Bharata Karya Aksara.
Oxford, University. 2001. Concise Oxford Dictionary, Tenth Edition. [CD-ROM]. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oxford, University. 2003. Oxford Learner’s Pocket Dictionary, Third Edition. Oxford: Oxford University.
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
Piaget, J. 1951. Cognitive Development in Children: Development in Learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 2.
Rosenshine, B & Furst, N. 1973. Research on Teacher Performance Criteria. In b. Smith (ED). Research in Teacher Education. Englewood Cleffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Sardiman. 2009.Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar.Jakarta:PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
Satori, Djam’an, et all. (2003). Implementasi Manajemen Berbasis Sekolah di Jawa Barat.
Silberman, M.L. (2006). Active Learning: 101 Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif (terjemahan). Bandung: Nuansa.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian pendidikan (pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.
