Menguji Keakuratan Instrumen Asesmen Awal: Validitas dan Reliabilitas dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah SMA melalui Analisis Aiken

Authors

  • Suryadi Ishak Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Baso Intang Sappaile Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Patahuddin Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Nisrina Fatin Hamidah Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Ulya Nur Alim Universitas Negeri Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47178/43rgt059

Keywords:

Content Validity, Reliability, Initial Assessment, Aiken Index, Senior High School History

Abstract

Initial assessment instruments play an important role in helping teachers understand students learning readiness before instruction begins, particularly in history subjects that require conceptual and chronological understanding. This study aims to analyze the validity and reliability of an intial assessment instrument developed based on senior high school history learning indicators. The research employed a descriptive quantitative approach, using Aiken's V indekx to assess content validity and inter-rater reliability. The assessment involved seven experts, including academics, linguist, and professional history teachers.The results indicated that 29 out of 35 items (82.9%) achieved an Aiken's V > 0.71 and were considered valid, while the remaining 6 items (17.1%) were below the threshold and recommended for revision. The inter-rater reliability analysis demonstrated high consistency, reinforcing the credibility ofthe validation process. These findings suggest that the developed initial assessment instrument is feasible and appropriate for identifying students readiness in high school history learning.

References

Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012

Arikunto, S. (2019). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan (Edisi Revisi). Bumi Aksara.

Azwar, S. (2017). Reliabilitas dan validitas. Pustaka Pelajar.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2011). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Gunawan, G., & Hidayati, K. (2024). IRT method for measuring the quality of high school mathematics mid-semester assessment questions in Magelang. Hipotenusa: Journal of Mathematical Society, 6(2), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.14421/hjms.2024.62.252

Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2014). Educational assessment of students (7th ed.). Pearson.

Robbins, S. P. (2018). Essentials of organizational behavior (14th ed.). Pearson.

Saepuzaman, D., Istiyono, E., Haryanto, H., Retnawati, H., & Yustiandi, Y. (2021). Analisis karakteristik butir soal fisika dengan pendekatan IRT penskoran dikotomus dan politomus. Radiasi: Jurnal Berkala Pendidikan Fisika, 14(2), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.21831/radiasi.v14i2.12345

Supranata, R. (2020). Pengukuran dan penilaian dalam pendidikan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Syamsuddin, S. (2023). Implementasi classic test dan item response theory pada penilaian tes pembelajaran matematika. EDUSCOPE: Jurnal Pendidikan, Pembelajaran, dan Teknologi, 8(2), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.30595/eduscope.v8i2.12345

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19