Tren Penelitian Perkembangan Anak SD: Sebuah Analisis Bibliometrik
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47178/dn87fs06Keywords:
Perkembangan anak Sekolah Dasar, Analisis bibliometrik, Tren penelitian, Pendidikan dasar, BiblioshinyAbstract
Masa sekolah dasar (SD) merupakan periode kritis dalam perkembangan anak yang mencakup aspek kognitif, sosial, emosional, dan fisik. Perkembangan ini memiliki dampak jangka panjang terhadap kesejahteraan dan kesuksesan akademik anak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis tren penelitian tentang perkembangan anak SD melalui pendekatan bibliometrik. Data penelitian diambil dari basis data Scopus dengan menggunakan kata kunci "perkembangan anak" dan "sekolah dasar". Analisis dilakukan menggunakan perangkat lunak Biblioshiny untuk mengidentifikasi topik penelitian populer, tren publikasi, kolaborasi antar peneliti, dan dampak penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan peningkatan minat dan publikasi dalam bidang ini sejak tahun 2000-an, dengan "Child Development" sebagai jurnal yang paling berpengaruh. Penelitian ini juga mengungkapkan kolaborasi yang kuat antara peneliti dan institusi internasional, serta berbagai tema utama seperti perkembangan kognitif, sosial, dan dampak pandemi COVID-19. Penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan wawasan mendalam bagi peneliti, pendidik, dan pembuat kebijakan dalam merancang program pendidikan yang lebih efektif dan relevan bagi anak SD.
References
C. Shammas, “The Extent and Duration of Primary Schooling in Eighteenth-Century America,” Hist. Educ. Q., vol. 63, no. 3, pp. 313–335, 2023, doi: 10.1017/heq.2023.12.
M. Black, A. Barnes, M. Strong, and D. Taylor-Robinson, “Impact of child development at primary school entry on adolescent health—protocol for a participatory systematic review,” Syst. Rev., vol. 10, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01694-6.
M. M. Gemmink, M. Fokkens-Bruinsma, I. Pauw, and K. van Veen, “How contextual factors influence teachers’ pedagogical practices,” Educ. Res., vol. 63, no. 4, pp. 396–415, 2021, doi: 10.1080/00131881.2021.1983452.
M. Aria and C. Cuccurullo, “bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis,” J. Informetr., vol. 11, no. 4, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007.
N. Donthu, S. Kumar, D. Mukherjee, N. Pandey, and W. Marc, “How to conduct a bibliometric analysis : An overview and guidelines,” J. Bus. Res., vol. 133, no. May, pp. 285–296, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070.
I. Zupic, “Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization,” vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 429–472, 2015, doi: 10.1177/1094428114562629.
B. C. Brookes, “Bradford’s law and the bibliography of science,” Nature, vol. 224, no. 5223, pp. 953–956, 1969, doi: 10.1038/224953a0.
S. Naranan, “Bradford’s law of bibliography of science: An interpretation,” Nature, vol. 227, no. 5258, pp. 631–632, 1970, doi: 10.1038/227631a0.
G. T. Venable et al., “Bradford’s law: Identification of the core journals for neurosurgery and its subspecialties,” J. Neurosurg., vol. 124, no. 2, pp. 569–579, 2016, doi: 10.3171/2015.3.JNS15149.
J. E. Jacobs, S. Lanza, D. W. Osgood, J. S. Eccles, and A. Wigfield, “Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades one through twelve,” Child Dev., vol. 73, no. 2, pp. 509–527, 2002, doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00421.
J. Eccles, A. Wigfield, R. D. Harold, and P. Blumenfeld, “Age and Gender Differences in Children’s Self‐ and Task Perceptions during Elementary School,” Child Dev., vol. 64, no. 3, pp. 830–847, 1993, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1993.tb02946.x.
E. S. Peisner-Feinberg et al., “The relation of preschool child-care quality to children’s cognitive and social developmental trajectories through second grade,” Child Dev., vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 1534–1553, 2001, doi: 10.1111/1467-8624.00364.
N. C. Jordan, D. Kaplan, C. Ramineni, and M. N. Locuniak, “Early Math Matters: Kindergarten Number Competence and Later Mathematics Outcomes,” Dev. Psychol., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 850–867, 2009, doi: 10.1037/a0014939.
D. Cvencek, A. N. Meltzoff, and A. G. Greenwald, “Math-Gender Stereotypes in Elementary School Children,” Child Dev., vol. 82, no. 3, pp. 766–779, 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01529.x.
E. C. Melhuish, M. B. Phan, K. Sylva, P. Sammons, I. Siraj-Blatchford, and B. Taggart, “Effects of the home learning environment and preschool center experience upon literacy and numeracy development in early primary school,” J. Soc. Issues, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 95–114, 2008, doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.00550.x.
S. A. Gelman, “The development of induction within natural kind and artifact categories,” Cogn. Psychol., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 65–95, 1988, doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(88)90025-4.
N. E. El Nokali, H. J. Bachman, and E. Votruba-Drzal, “Parent involvement and children’s academic and social development in elementary school,” Child Dev., vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 988–1005, 2010, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01447.x.
S. C. Levine, L. W. Suriyakham, M. L. Rowe, J. Huttenlocher, and E. A. Gunderson, “What counts in the development of young children’s number knowledge?,” Dev. Psychol., vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 1309–1319, 2010, doi: 10.1037/a0019671.
E. E. O’Connor, E. Dearing, and B. A. Collins, “Teacher-child relationship and behavior problem trajectories in elementary school,” Am. Educ. Res. J., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 120–162, 2011, doi: 10.3102/0002831210365008.
