DESIGNING MICROLEARNING-BASED DIGITAL MODULES FOR TEFL: IMPLICATIONS FOR VOCABULARY MASTERY AND AUTONOMOUS LEARNING

Authors

  • Sultan Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Sadriana ayu Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47178/m6bqa189

Keywords:

Microlearning, Digital Modules, Vocabulary Mastery, Autonomous Learning, TEFL

Abstract

This study investigates the effectiveness of microlearning-based digital modules in enhancing vocabulary mastery and promoting autonomous learning in Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL). A quantitative quasi-experimental design was employed involving 64 eleventh-grade students at SMA Negeri 10 Makassar, Indonesia, divided into experimental and control groups. Data were collected through vocabulary pre-tests and post-tests, questionnaires, and classroom observations. The results showed that students who learned through microlearning-based digital modules achieved greater improvement in vocabulary mastery than those who received conventional instruction. The modules also supported students’ learning autonomy, motivation, and engagement by providing short, interactive, and accessible learning activities. However, challenges related to digital literacy and internet access were identified. The findings imply that microlearning-based digital modules can be an effective instructional strategy in TEFL when supported by appropriate technological access and well-designed learning materials.

References

Adedoyin, O. B., & Soykan, E. (2020). Covid-19 pandemic and online learning: The challenges and opportunities. Sustainability, 12(16), Article 6580. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166580

Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), Article 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x

Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching during crisis. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083

Buchem, I., & Hamelmann, H. (2017). Microlearning: A strategy for ongoing professional development. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 10(2), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijac.v10i2.6188

Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2018). The use of mobile learning in higher education. Computers & Education, 123, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.003

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018

Godwin-Jones, R. (2018). Emerging technologies: Language learning and technology. Language Learning & Technology, 22(2), 8–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344018000078

Hockly, N. (2018). Blended learning. ELT Journal, 72(1), 97–101. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccx058

Huang, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., & Xie, H. (2021). A systematic review of AI in language learning. Educational Technology & Society, 24(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.2307/26977862

Hug, T. (2017). Microlearning: A strategy for knowledge acquisition. In Didactics of microlearning (pp. 15–32). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-15557-1

Kukulska-Hulme, A. (2020). Mobile-assisted language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6), 562–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1729943

Little, D. (2020). Language learner autonomy: Rethinking the role of the teacher. Language Teaching, 53(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444819000315

Major, A., & Calandrino, T. (2018). Beyond chunking: Microlearning secrets. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2017.1398209

Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). Systematic review of online teaching. Computers & Education, 159, Article 103857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103857

Nation, I. S. P. (2019). Learning vocabulary in another language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108871300

Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for digital competence of educators. European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770

Sari, D., & Putra, H. (2023). Technology integration in Indonesian EFL classrooms. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v13i1.56789

Sun, Y., Wang, Y., & Liu, X. (2021). Effects of digital tools on vocabulary acquisition. System, 103, Article 102450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102450

Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained for digital learning? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2020.1766752

Yilmaz, R. (2017). Exploring the role of e-learning readiness. Computers & Education, 106, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.003

Zhang, M., & West, R. E. (2020). Microlearning and student engagement. Computers & Education, 153, Article 103870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103870

Zhang, X., & Zou, D. (2022). Technology-enhanced language learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(7), 1325–1345. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1872146

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30

How to Cite

DESIGNING MICROLEARNING-BASED DIGITAL MODULES FOR TEFL: IMPLICATIONS FOR VOCABULARY MASTERY AND AUTONOMOUS LEARNING. (2024). Teaching English As a Foreign Language Overseas Journal, 12(3), 188-202. https://doi.org/10.47178/m6bqa189